Back to Executive Branch
๐Ÿ›Executive BranchAgency Operations

Federal Procurement Efficiency

How efficiently does the federal government award contracts, and what share uses competitive bidding?

Updated QuarterlyAs of 2024-09-30High data quality

Historical Trend

Data sourced from official government APIs

What It Measures

The percentage of federal contract dollars awarded through full and open competition versus sole-source or limited-competition awards, plus average contract award cycle time (days from solicitation to award).

Formula

Competition Rate (%) = Competitive Contract $ รท Total Contract $ ร— 100

Why It Matters

Competitive procurement reduces costs, encourages innovation, and reduces corruption risk. GAO and IG reports consistently find that non-competitive contracting is a major source of waste and fraud. Award cycle time affects contractor participation and agency responsiveness.

Data Caveats
  • "Full and open competition" does not guarantee efficiency; task order contracts may reduce transparency.
  • IDIQ vehicles are not always visible in transaction-level data.
  • GSA schedule orders are considered competitive but may not reflect true market pricing.

Drill-Down Options

  • By agency
  • By contract type (FFP, cost-plus, T&M)
  • By competition type
  • Small business set-aside share
  • By NAICS code / industry

Suggested Dashboard Layout

Example Visualization

Stacked bar chart of competitive vs. non-competitive contract dollars by year. Pie chart of competition type breakdown. Agency comparison table with trend indicators.

Suggested Chart Types

Bar ChartLine ChartData Table

Related KPIs